| DEAL ISLAND WEATHER |
| Web Counters | ||||||
|
|
(Continued Page 2) Marmaduke Mister on the Revenge and the Bachelors Delight The Circumstantial Case for John Fitzhugh Millars Account A family history of two probable buccaneering journeys by Billy J. Mister 12 October 2026
No surviving muster roll names Marmaduke Mister, so his service cannot be proved in the strict documentary sense. The independent chronology nevertheless supports John Fitzhugh Millar's essential account. Cook and Davis's buccaneers reached Virginia with three prizes in April 1683. Marmaduke recorded three coordinated Bachelor tracts on 15 June. The best prize was refitted in Virginia as Revenge and sailed on 23 August under a plan to seize a better ship in Africa. Only after that capture did the replacement become Bachelors Delight. The sequence makes Marmaduke's participation in both journeys a serious circumstantial conclusion rather than a family story invented after the fact. What the Evidence Can Show This account tells the two journeys that Marmaduke Mister most likely made. It follows Millar's reconstruction, but it keeps That distinction matters because pirate companies rarely left complete crew rolls. The surviving accounts name captains, navigators, surgeons, and men involved in memorable incidents. They do not list every one of the fifty-two to seventy men who left the Chesapeake. Marmaduke's absence from those narratives lowers certainty, but it does not exclude him. The First Journey Across Darien The story probably begins with the English buccaneers who crossed the Isthmus of Darien around 1680 and entered the Pacific, then called the South Sea. Their passage was an ordeal of wet tropical forest, flooded rivers, hunger, and exhausting marches. Once on the Pacific side, the company seized vessels and attacked Spanish shipping and settlements. Disputes divided the men into smaller parties, and several future leaders of the 1683 expedition emerged from this network, including John Cook, Edward Davis, William Dampier, and Lionel Wafer. [2, 4, 7, 8] Millar's account places Marmaduke among the unnamed men moving through that world. No extent list proves the identification, but this first expedition explains something the land records alone cannot: how a young Eastern Shore man could have returned with portable wealth large enough to establish himself quickly. Buccaneer shares were paid in captured coin, plate, cloth, and other goods. They could be divided far from any formal port and carried home in a chest. After the South Sea companies broke apart, Cook and Davis's party continued through the Caribbean. Dampier says that the men divided captured goods, seized Captain Tristan's vessel, and then took two more prizes. One carried wine. Another was strong enough to serve in a new South Sea voyage. In April 1683 they reached Virginia with their prizes. The plural matters: this was a small captured flotilla, not one ship making an isolated call. [2] The Virginia Interval and the Land Purchase The April arrival created a narrow window before the next expedition sailed. The company sold wine, refitted the best prize, gathered men, weapons, and supplies, and prepared to leave from the Virginia Eastern Shore. Marmaduke's land transactions fall directly inside that interval. Tract Acres Record date Ownership note
The four land entries total 800 acres. [1] On 15 June, Marmaduke entered three adjoining or associated names built around the word Bachelor: Bachelor's Contrivance, Bachelor's Delight, and Bachelor's Invention. A single familiar phrase might be coincidence. Three coordinated names entered on one day look deliberate. They suggest that Bachelor already carried meaning for Marmaduke and his associates before Cook's men captured the Danish vessel that later bore the same name. [1] James Wyeth shared the 250-acre Bachelor's Delight entry. His later absence from the readily located record is intriguing, but it does not prove that he sailed or died in battle. For this argument his role is secondary. The important fact is that Marmaduke appears in a coordinated group of Bachelor land names during the precise interval between two buccaneering voyages. What the Land May Have Cost A Maryland land patent did not necessarily require a cash purchase resembling a modern realestate closing. Rights could arise from warrants, assignments, headrights, service, or payment of the province's caution money. A rate associated with the 1683 period was about 200 pounds of tobacco for each 100 acres. At that rate, 800 acres represented roughly 1,600 pounds of tobacco. The 250-acre Bachelor's Delight tract represented about 500 pounds, divided in an unknown proportion between Marmaduke and Wyeth. [14] Using farm prices of roughly six-tenths to one penny per pound for Maryland tobacco in the early 1680s, 1,600 pounds of tobacco was worth approximately four to six pounds thirteen shillings sterling. No single modern conversion is exact. A consumer-price comparison places that amount in the neighborhood of 1,000 to 2,000 present-day U.S. dollars. An earnings or labor-value comparison produces a much larger figure, roughly 15,000 to 30,000 dollars. The second range better conveys the effort required to accumulate the sum, but neither range is a modern market value for 800 acres. [14, 15] The point is not that Marmaduke needed a fortune equal to the land's value today. The point is that he needed substantial resources at a young age, along with the ability to survey, record, and secure several tracts in quick succession. A buccaneering share offers one plausible source. It is not the only possible source, and no surviving account traces a particular coin or piece of plate from a prize chest into the land office. The Second Journey on the Revenge While Marmaduke's land was being entered, Cook's company prepared the best of its captured vessels for sea. The ship was fitted with eighteen guns and called Revenge. Dampier places the departure from Accomack on 23 August 1683 with about seventy men. Cowley's printed account gives Cape Charles and fifty-two men, while one manuscript version gives Smith's Island and August 4. These accounts differ in date and place, and neither supplies a complete crew roster. [2, 3, 16] In that manuscript, Cowley says he was hired in Virginia in June 1683 under the pretense of taking the ship to Petit-Guâve. After leaving Smith's Island, Cook and the company disclosed their real plan: Guinea first, to obtain a better ship, then the South Sea. [16] If Marmaduke sailed again, he had spent only a few months ashore. He would have converted part of his earlier share into land, left the property behind, and joined a voyage whose leader already intended to return to the Pacific. The Virginia ship name at departure was Revenge. The later name Bachelors Delight belonged to a replacement they had not yet captured. The Planned Capture in Africa Cowley's firsthand account supplies the crucial detail. After leaving Virginia, the insiders disclosed their design: they would sail to Guinea, obtain a better ship, and then proceed for the South Sea. In other words, the African capture was not an improvised decision made after reaching the coast. The company crossed the Atlantic intending to steal a vessel suited to the greater voyage. [3] Near Sierra Leone they found the Danish ship Charlotta Amalia. Danish research identifies her as a Guinea trader under Captain Thomas Thorsen. Cook's smaller English vessel overpowered her in late 1683. The buccaneers transferred into the larger prize, disposed of their old vessel, and eventually called the captured ship Bachelors Delight. [3, 6] This order of events is the heart of the naming argument. Marmaduke's three Bachelor tracts existed in Maryland before the African capture. Cook's company had already planned to take a replacement ship. The later ship name therefore could reflect a name or identity agreed upon before the men ever reached Africa. The documents do not identify the person who proposed it, so this remains an inference. But it fits the chronology better than the older story that Marmaduke named his land years later after returning on a ship already called Bachelors Delight. Around Cape Horn and Back into the South Sea Aboard their stolen Danish vessel, the company crossed the Atlantic again and forced its way around Cape Horn. The route exposed the men to cold, violent seas, damaged rigging, illness, and the danger of being driven away from land for weeks. Once in the Pacific, they resumed the life of the earlier expedition: searching for Spanish shipping, taking coastal prizes, and moving between isolated islands and anchorages where water, food, and repairs could be found. Lane and Bradley place the expedition within the second wave of English and French buccaneering on the coasts of Peru. [7, 8] Cook died during the voyage, and Edward Davis took command. Under Davis, the company ranged along the Pacific coast and accumulated plate, coin, and goods through raids and captures. The men lived for years inside an unstable floating partnership. Captains changed, companies divided, ships separated, and sailors transferred from one vessel to another. This fluid organization helps explain why a man could participate for years without appearing in the few names an author chose to record. The Return to the Chesapeake By 1688, Davis, Wafer, John Hinson, and Peter Cloise were making their way back into the English colonies. Wafer says they reached Philadelphia, traveled down the Delaware River, carted their chests across the neck of land to the Bohemia River, and descended Chesapeake Bay toward Virginia. Captain Simon Rowe stopped them near the mouth of the James River. Virginia records describe plate, money, and goods valuable enough to trigger years of petitions, imprisonment, and litigation. Part of the disputed property was eventually directed toward the proposed College of William and Mary. [4, 5, 9-12] Millar's reconstruction says that members of the company were left at Atlantic ports with their shares before the vessel was sold in Philadelphia. A later Sussex County account, expressly derived from Millar, says that crewmen were put ashore near what became Laurel and used the name Bachelors Delight for a plantation. The underlying contemporary citation has not yet been recovered, so the Sussex detail should be treated as a published lead rather than a proven fact. It is important, however, that the story belongs to Millar's work. It was not invented by the present Mister family research. [13] If Marmaduke returned separately, the narratives may never have had reason to name him. He could have left the company before the arrests, returned by another vessel, or remained connected to the venture without completing every leg. Somerset County records place him back in the region after the voyage period. What survives is the footprint of his land and its names, not a sailor's discharge paper. Why Millars Account Is Persuasive The case does not depend on one matching name. It depends on the way several independent facts meet in a narrow period. Veterans of the first South Sea expedition arrived in Virginia with captured goods and three vessels in April 1683. Marmaduke recorded 800 acres in June, including three coordinated Bachelor names. The best prize was prepared as Revenge and left in August. Cowley says the leaders had already planned to steal a better ship in Africa. After doing so, they called the replacement Bachelors Delight. The same buccaneering leaders later returned through Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Chesapeake Bay with treasure. [1-5] There are reasonable alternatives. Bachelor was not a unique phrase, and another vessel of that name sailed to Hudson Bay in 1682. Marmaduke may have obtained land through family, trade, credit, or ordinary work. He may have known the buccaneers without sailing with them. Those possibilities prevent absolute proof. They do not readily explain the three coordinated tract names, their date between the voyages, the unexplained resources, and the later use of the same phrase by a company that had recruited and refitted in the Chesapeake. [6] The most defensible family conclusion is this: John Fitzhugh Millar was probably correct in substance. Marmaduke Mister likely belonged to the Chesapeake circle surrounding Cook and Davis. He may have earned a share on the earlier journey across Darien, invested part of it in Maryland land, and sailed from Virginia on Revenge for the expedition that captured and renamed Bachelors Delight. The record is circumstantial, but the chronology is unusually coherent. Sources and Research Notes The source notes distinguish contemporary accounts from later histories. Contemporary sources establish the voyage sequence and land dates. Later writers help interpret the record but cannot replace the missing muster roll. [1] Settlers of Maryland 1679 to 1783, p 457, entry for Marmaduke Mister. Index supplied by Billy Mister. It lists Tilbury on 8 June 1683 and Bachelor's Contrivance, Bachelor's Delight, and Bachelor's Invention on 15 June 1683. Online source [2] William Dampier, A New Voyage Round the World, 1697. Firsthand account of the earlier Isthmus network, division of captured goods, April 1683 arrival in Virginia with prizes, fitting out of Revenge, and August departure. Online source [3] William Ambrosia Cowley, Voyage Round the Globe, published 1699. Firsthand account of the departure aboard Revenge and the plan to obtain a better vessel in Guinea before proceeding to the South Sea. Online source [4] Lionel Wafer, A New Voyage and Description of the Isthmus of America, 1699. Firsthand account of the Isthmus and of the 1688 return through Philadelphia, the Delaware River, Maryland, and Chesapeake Bay. Online source [5] Executive Journals of the Council of Colonial Virginia. Official record of the seizure, claimed Pennsylvania and Maryland route, plate and money, imprisonment, petitions, and proposed journey to England. Online source [6] Asta Bredsdorff, Fregatten Charlotte Amalias maerkelige skaebne, reproduced in Per Christensen, ed, Gluckstadt Dreams Ships and Men, 2016. Danish study of Captain Thomas Thorsen and Charlotta Amalia. It independently supports the identity and seizure of the replacement vessel and notes a separate 1682 Hudson Bay ship called Bachelors Delight. Online source [7] Kris E Lane, Pillaging the Empire, chapter 5. Modern scholarly synthesis of the South Sea buccaneers and the transition from Caribbean privateering to Pacific expeditions. Online source [8] Peter T Bradley, Pirates on the Coasts of Peru 1598 to 1701, chapter 7. Regional study of the second wave of English and French buccaneers from 1683 to 1689. Online source [9] Donald G Shomette, Pirates on the Chesapeake, pp 84 to 92. Detailed secondary account of the Davis, Wafer, and Hinson case based on official records. Online source [10] Lloyd Haynes Williams, Pirates of Colonial Virginia, 1937. Regional history useful for Chesapeake context and documentary leads. Online source [11] Edmund Berkeley Jr, Three Philanthropic Pirates, 1966. Focused study of Davis, Wafer, Hinson, and the funds later connected to the College of William and Mary. Online source [12] Jamie L H Goodall, Pirates of the Chesapeake Bay, 2020, pp 29 to 31. Modern narrative synthesis of the Davis, Wafer, Hinson, and Cloise episode. Online source [13] John Fitzhugh Millar, Buccaneers Davis Wafer Hingson and Dampier and the Ship Bachelors Delight, 2010, and Delmar Historical and Arts Society, Was Laurel Settled By Pirates, 2013. Millar is the source tradition for the Atlantic-port dispersal and Sussex County story. The local account attributes its claim to his research but does not reproduce an underlying contemporary citation. Online source [14] Maryland State Archives land record guidance and Russell R Menard, Farm Prices of Maryland Tobacco 1659 to 1710, Maryland Historical Magazine 68, 1973. Used to explain caution money, tobacco as a payment measure, and the approximate early 1680s farm-price range. The exact legal basis and consideration for each Mister tract would require inspection of the original patent and warrant files. Online source [15] MeasuringWorth United Kingdom comparison calculator. Used only for broad present-day consumer-price and earnings comparisons. Such conversions illustrate scale and are not appraisals of the land. Online source [16] William Ambrosia Cowley, Virginia manuscript (T8525a3), departure narrative, transcribed in “Cowley Manuscript Comparison,” WhaleSite, https://whalesite.org/GT/TEXTS/TURNLAMB.htm (accessed 13 October 2026). |
the boundary between record and inference visible. The voyages, ships, 